Data protection, confidentiality and privacy. Opinion, Review, and Commentary articles) must cite appropriate and relevant literature in support of the claims made. Why my paper is still in "under consideration" for such a long time?
Guidelines for Authors - Review Commons The research leading to these results received funding from [] under Grant Agreement No[].
What does manuscript under editorial consideration mean? Type on separate pages. 333341. Please see Springer Natures information on recommended repositories. Publishing in Nature Research journals: Difference between "Editorial Decision Started" and "Manuscript under consideration", Scan this QR code to download the app now. Springer Nature. This work was supported by [] (Grant numbers [] and []). You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. Further, please note that the manuscript status might not always be updated instantly. This may be a correction or retraction. This is the official first publication citable with the DOI. Reasons for these changes in authorship should be explained.
Data are however available from the authors upon reasonable request and with permission of [THIRD PARTY NAME]. These submissions are not given any priority over other manuscripts, and Editorial Board Member status has no bearing on editorial consideration. Work submitted for publication may have implications for public health or general welfare and in those cases it is the responsibility of all authors to include the appropriate disclosures and declarations. Once you have submitted your manuscript, it goes through the following editorial process: The journals editorial assistant will check that the manuscript and associated materials are complete. This research study was conducted retrospectively from data obtained for clinical purposes. Non-financial interests: Author D has served on advisory boards for Company M, Company N and Company O. The reason will be given in the published erratum/correction, expression of concern or retraction note. Combination artwork should have a minimum resolution of 600 dpi. In many instances authors will need to secure written consent before including images. If you are unclear whether your article type requires a disclosure statement, please contact the Editor-in-Chief. The data reproduced from Article X utilized human tissue that was procured via our Biobank AB, which provides de-identified samples. The questionnaire and methodology for this study was approved by the Human Research Ethics committee of the University of D (Ethics approval number: ). The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose. Disclosure of potential conflicts of interest, Research involving Human Participants and/or Animals, Partial financial support was received from []. Authors are strongly advised to ensure the author group, the Corresponding Author, and the order of authors are all correct at submission. If they are an author or have any other competing interest regarding a specific manuscript, another Editor or member of the Editorial Board will be assigned to assume responsibility for overseeing peer review. When reporting a study that involved human participants, their data or biological material, authors should include a statement that confirms that the study was approved (or granted exemption) by the appropriate institutional and/or national research ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) and certify that the study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. How do I write an inquiry to the editor about a delay in the decision on a revised manuscript? Conceptualization: [full name], ; Methodology: [full name], ; Formal analysis and investigation: [full name], ; Writing - original draft preparation: [full name, ]; Writing - review and editing: [full name], ; Funding acquisition: [full name], ; Resources: [full name], ; Supervision: [full name],. Keep lettering consistently sized throughout your final-sized artwork, usually about 23 mm (812 pt). Statements should include, where applicable, hyperlinks to publicly archived datasets analysed or generated during the study. Authors should include a statement that confirms that an institutional or independent ethics committee (including the name of the ethics committee) approved the study and that informed consent was obtained from the donor or next of kin. We first read and discuss each manuscript in light of our editorial criteria and . Decisions are reversed on appeal only if the editors are convinced that the original decision was an error. General repositories - for all types of research data - such as figshare and Dryad may be used where appropriate. When it is not possible to share research data publicly, for instance when individual privacy could be compromised, data availability should still be stated in the manuscript along with any conditions for access. The Human Investigation Committee (IRB) of University B approved this study. Sample statements for "Consent to participate": Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study. But the confusing part is, is that the reviewer are now done with reviewing (Review completed) but the new status became apperently ''Manuscript under consideration". It is recommended that authors check the NCBI database for misidentification and contamination of human cell lines. Interests within the last 3 years of beginning the work (conducting the research and preparing the work for submission) should be reported. Upon transfer, if the manuscript is assessed by the receiving journal to be a good fit and technically sound, it may be accepted without further review. [CDATA[// >Science Journals: Editorial Policies | Science | AAAS Complete anonymity is difficult to achieve in some cases. and JavaScript. The data that support the findings of this study are available from [THIRD PARTY NAME] but restrictions apply to the availability of these data, which were used under licence for the current study, and so are not publicly available. This information will automatically be added to the Record of CrossMark, however it is not added to the manuscript itself. Accessed December 31, 2006. An IRB official waiver of ethical approval was granted from the IRB of XYZ. They should consider if the authors have complied with the journals policy on the availability of research data, and whether reasonable effort has been made to make the data that support the findings of the study available for replication or reuse by other researchers. 2023 Springer Nature Switzerland AG. Adding and/or deleting authors during the revision stages is generally not permitted, but in some cases may be warranted.
Tips for Authors | From Nature Publishing Group Editorial Board Members and Editors are required to declare any competing interests and may be excluded from the peer review process if a competing interest exists. Interests outside the 3-year time frame must be disclosed if they could reasonably be perceived as influencing the submitted work. [CDATA[// >